IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v7y2016i2p116-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two opposing literary critiques of socialism: George Orwell versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Makovi

Abstract

Orwell's famous fictions, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four criticised totalitarian forms of socialism from a public choice perspective, assuming that socialism would work as an economic system as long as the proper political institutions were in place to curb the potential for the abuse of power. This is contrasted with two novels by others who took the opposite approach: Richter's Pictures of the Socialistic Future and Hazlitt's Time Will Run Back. These two assumed that the political implementation of socialism would be perfect but that socialism would necessarily turn totalitarian because of the problem of economic calculation. These novels assumed away the public choice problem of institutions and the abuse of power and focused on the political implications of socialism as a purely economic system. Contrasting these two sets of novels shows how the Austrian and public choice schools criticise socialism in two entirely different ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Makovi, 2016. "Two opposing literary critiques of socialism: George Orwell versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 116-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:116-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78836
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:116-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.