IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v15y2025i4p317-329.html

Assessing pedagogy effectiveness: applying the Solomon experimental design

Author

Listed:
  • Suddhasanta De
  • Jayanta Banerjee
  • Keya Das Ghosh

Abstract

Women's empowerment through skill development is a crucial component of economic inclusion, particularly in rural areas where economic participation is limited. However, identifying effective pedagogical tools to enhance economic education remains a challenge. This study investigates the impact of two pedagogical approaches - video and storytelling - on the effectiveness of learning and entrepreneurial skill development within the framework of pluralist economic thought. Using Solomon's four-group experimental design, data were collected from participants in the Anandadhara project, an initiative by the Indian government aimed at promoting women's economic participation through entrepreneurial training, launched in 2012. The study aligns with pluralist economic education by examining the intersection of pedagogical strategies and economic agency. Findings indicate that video-based learning significantly enhances sales skills compared to storytelling, underscoring the importance of diverse educational methods in fostering economic empowerment. The study contributes to discussions on inclusive economic policies and pluralist approaches to skill development, offering insights for policymakers and educators worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Suddhasanta De & Jayanta Banerjee & Keya Das Ghosh, 2025. "Assessing pedagogy effectiveness: applying the Solomon experimental design," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 317-329.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:317-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=150357
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:317-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.