IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v2y2007i4p357-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gains, losses and thresholds of influence in social networks

Author

Listed:
  • J. Todd Hamill
  • Richard F. Deckro
  • Victor D. Wiley
  • Robert S. Renfro

Abstract

Influence campaigns seek to achieve political objectives through conveyance of information that affects behaviour. Further developing connections between Social Science's interpersonal influence theory and Operations Research's (OR) network flow formulation, the resulting methodology explores courses of action seeking to influence an inaccessible target audience using their indigenous social network as a conduit. A notional clandestine organisation using the Generalized Network Flow (GNF) problem is analysed. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the sponsors, the US Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US government.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Todd Hamill & Richard F. Deckro & Victor D. Wiley & Robert S. Renfro, 2007. "Gains, losses and thresholds of influence in social networks," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 357-379.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:2:y:2007:i:4:p:357-379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=14168
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schneider, Kellie & Rainwater, Chase & Pohl, Ed & Hernandez, Ivan & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2013. "Social network analysis via multi-state reliability and conditional influence models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 99-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:2:y:2007:i:4:p:357-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.