On the role of volatility for modelling risk exposure
We show in this paper that volatility measures can be misleading indicators of risk if returns do not follow a Gaussian distribution. A more reliable measure of risk is the probability distribution of the return on an asset. Estimators for these measures are usually challenging and need of nonparametric and semi-parametric techniques. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it proposes the use of semi-parametric estimators of the distribution function of the return on an asset based on extreme value theory for computing Value-at-Risk; and second, it discusses the validity of different volatility models in this semi-parametric framework. The conclusion is that different volatility models can yield different valid risk measures if coupled with the appropriate distribution function. Hence the puzzle in the choice of volatility measures. This is shown in an empirical exercise for data of financial indexes from USA, UK, Germany, Japan and Spain.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 1 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=218 |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:1:y:2008:i:2:p:219-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.