IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v14y2015i1p15-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cross-cultural comparison of whistleblowing perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Xintong Cheng
  • Khondkar E. Karim
  • Karen Jingrong Lin

Abstract

Through an empirical examination, this research reports on the results of cultural influences on whistleblowing decisions and the perception of people from individualistic cultures and those from collectivist cultures. We utilise cultural differences and characteristics between different nations to formulate hypotheses that individuals from collectivist cultures are less likely to be whistle-blowers, and less accepting of whistleblowing behaviour, than individuals from individualistic cultures. Data were collected through a survey given to subjects of British and Chinese students from the University of Glasgow. The results support hypotheses about diversity in decisions made by individuals from individualistic cultures compared to those from collectivist cultures. The research findings have implications for the administration of domestic and multinational corporations. In order to enhance the effectiveness of internal control systems in various nations, such systems should take cultural differences into consideration. The results suggest that, compared to collectivist cultures, whistleblowing as an organisational strategy of internal control systems is more likely to be effective in individualistic cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Xintong Cheng & Khondkar E. Karim & Karen Jingrong Lin, 2015. "A cross-cultural comparison of whistleblowing perceptions," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 15-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:14:y:2015:i:1:p:15-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=67374
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Oelrich, 2019. "Making regulation fit by taking irrationality into account: the case of the whistleblower," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 175-207, April.
    2. Anastasia Cheliatsidou & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Alexandros Garefalakis & Ioannis Passas & Konstantinos Spinthiropoulos, 2023. "Exploring Attitudes towards Whistleblowing in Relation to Sustainable Municipalities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:14:y:2015:i:1:p:15-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.