IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v7y2010i3-4p403-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) as a relational contract: an incomplete contracting perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Min Kim
  • Joseph T. Mahoney

Abstract

This paper analyses collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) from an incomplete contracting perspective. In the absence of economic incentive problems, CPFR enables trading partners to improve operational efficiency through a structured process of learning by both sharing and utilising information across firm-level boundaries. From a review of the incomplete contracts literature and a case study of the CPFR arrangement between P&G and Wal-Mart, this paper posits CPFR as a relational contract for managing economic incentive problems, which can arise in a vertical supply relationship due to transaction costs, agency costs, and relative bargaining positions. Theoretical propositions are developed regarding when this IT-supported intermediate form of vertical contracting is preferred to other governance modes and how CPFR can be an effective relational contract to support economic exchange and to create intellectual capital between trading partners. With efficient vertical coordination and enhanced specialisation incentives for mutual commitment, CPFR allows contracting parties to avoid the difficulties of formal contracting while realising the benefits that would be anticipated from vertical financial ownership.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Min Kim & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2010. "Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) as a relational contract: an incomplete contracting perspective," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3/4), pages 403-428.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:7:y:2010:i:3/4:p:403-428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=34377
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daekwan Kim & Ruey-Jer Bryan Jean & Rudolf R. Sinkovics, 2018. "Drivers of Virtual Interfirm Integration and Its Impact on Performance in International Customer–Supplier Relationships," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 495-522, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:7:y:2010:i:3/4:p:403-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.