IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v19y2022i3p236-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Islamic banks intellectually efficient? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Amitava Mondal
  • Sudip Mukherjee
  • Radhagobinda Basak

Abstract

This paper measures the value creation efficiency of intellectual capital management of seven Islamic banks in Bangladesh over eight years starting from 2011 to 2018 and examines the impact of intellectual capital management on the financial performance of the sample Islamic banks. VAICTM model has been used to measure the value creation efficiency of intellectual capital management. The financial performance of the banks has been measured with the help of productivity and profitability ratios. We performed panel regression and robust regression analysis with an appropriate method to analyse the data. The results of the present empirical study suggest that the profitability and productivity of Islamic banks of Bangladesh primarily driven by human capital efficiency rather than structural capital efficiency and financial and physical capital efficiency. The present study is the first empirical study that examined intellectual capital management and its impact on the financial performances of Islamic banks in Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Amitava Mondal & Sudip Mukherjee & Radhagobinda Basak, 2022. "Are Islamic banks intellectually efficient? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 236-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:236-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=122589
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:236-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.