IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v17y2020i3p217-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational innovation in the business field: a systematic review according to Brazilian's coordination of higher education improvement stratum classification

Author

Listed:
  • Fernanda Edileuza Riccomini
  • Claudia Brito Silva Cirani
  • Samara De Carvalho Pedro
  • Kambou Sie Kevin

Abstract

This paper aims to bring a better understanding of educational innovation related to business and economics by presenting systematic review on educational innovation, from papers indexed in Web of Science, without temporal delimitation, until 2017. Among the studies found, 18 papers were published in journals with A1 and A2 stratum in the Brazilian coordination of higher education improvement, categorised according to educational innovation dimensions proposed by OECD (2014). It seeks to offer a qualitative analysis of how these researches are being directed, observing the gaps related to the research object, as well as to understand how the field envisions the theme of educational innovation. The results reveal the predominance of empirical studies towards school, considering more global studies on the market and theoretical research. There is need for more studies focused on other dimensions such as innovation in resources availability for classroom's teaching and educational marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernanda Edileuza Riccomini & Claudia Brito Silva Cirani & Samara De Carvalho Pedro & Kambou Sie Kevin, 2020. "Educational innovation in the business field: a systematic review according to Brazilian's coordination of higher education improvement stratum classification," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 217-241.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:217-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=109922
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:217-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.