IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v10y2013i3-4p314-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potholes of knowledge accounting model

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Ali Mohammad

Abstract

Knowledge age is a fact not a fad. Knowledge business model has entirely different and new drivers than those business models that came before it. Transformation into knowledge economy has entailed seismic changes in the business infrastructure of companies. Utilisation of knowledge business model requires unique changes and restructuring for the accounting model. The theoretical question to be examined throughout the course of this paper is whether accounting by its status quo has a unique model of knowledge? Knowledge accounting as an academic subject has been largely neglected by the professional bodies and scholars of accounting. Measurement and disclosure of knowledge assets and revenues have represented the key critics and lacks of the accounting model and practices. Accordingly, this paper seeks to explore lacks of the existed accounting model that hinder the establishment of knowledge accounting model. The main methodological component of the current research has been based on analysing the literature of innovation, knowledge management, and accounting. Such analysis has shown serious potholes in the logical structure of the accounting model. The paper ends with the suggestions to extend the research for frameworking knowledge accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Ali Mohammad, 2013. "Potholes of knowledge accounting model," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3/4), pages 314-325.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:10:y:2013:i:3/4:p:314-325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=57428
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:10:y:2013:i:3/4:p:314-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.