IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijiscm/v4y2009i1p3-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An institutional perspective on quality initiatives: evidence beyond manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Jami L. DelliFraine
  • James R. Langabeer II

Abstract

Organisational quality improvement techniques have been gaining acceptance in industry over the last few decades, although the extent of their utilisation is highly variable. Most of the evidence of their potential has been within the manufacturing sector, and it is unclear whether they have scope or value outside of manufacturing. We examine two quality improvement initiatives, Lean and Six Sigma, to assess adoption from an institutional theory perspective in the healthcare industry. Findings from our survey of 118 organisations suggest that these quality initiatives have higher levels of rhetoric than actual results. From an institutional theory perspective, results suggest that early adopters of these quality techniques will have a different focus or emphasis than late adopters, and that the focus changes overtime from clinical projects to administrative projects. Implications suggest a need for greater emphasis on change management to mitigate the perceived internal sources of resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jami L. DelliFraine & James R. Langabeer II, 2009. "An institutional perspective on quality initiatives: evidence beyond manufacturing," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 3-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:3-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niñerola, Angels & Sánchez-Rebull, María-Victoria & Hernández-Lara, Ana-Beatriz, 2020. "Quality improvement in healthcare: Six Sigma systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 438-445.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:3-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=79 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.