IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijimad/v20y2024i2p119-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reassessing brand versus concept associations: comparing free association task and sensory cue-based task

Author

Listed:
  • Tilottama G. Chowdhury
  • Feisal Murshed
  • Meghan Messier

Abstract

Brand associations can trigger memories of people, places, and emotions that are desirable and as such, creating and maintaining a unique set of brand associations in the consumers' mind space takes on increasing importance in today's interactive marketing environment. This article explores an important variation in the nature and dynamics of brand associations based on two distinct approaches: free association task versus sensory cue-based task. Studies 1a and 2a employed the sensory cue-based task (related to the sound, taste, touch, smell, and sight) and studies 1b and 2b utilised the traditional free association approach to extract participants' brand associations pertaining to a financial service brand and the concept associations related to financial security. Findings indicate that the free association task evokes tangible associations and conversely, the sensory cue-based task evokes intangible associations. The article contributes to branding theory, marketing communication literature, and offers managerial insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Tilottama G. Chowdhury & Feisal Murshed & Meghan Messier, 2024. "Reassessing brand versus concept associations: comparing free association task and sensory cue-based task," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 119-140.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:119-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137918
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:119-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=84 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.