IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v14y2013i3-4p383-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and satisfaction - two premises for healthcare service innovation and development: the perspective of UCSPVR users

Author

Listed:
  • Fernanda Maria Duarte Nogueira
  • Maria José de Matos Rainho
  • Lucinda Fátima Costa Vaz Silva

Abstract

Innovation may be approached as the implementation of new or significantly improved products, of new processes, of new organisational methods for business practices and the local organisation of work or changes in the organisation's external relationships. In such contexts, the opinions of healthcare service users play a fundamental role in the reform of healthcare units, and especially in terms of economic efficiency, improving care standards and innovating in organisational structures and processes. This article studies the level of user satisfaction with the services provided by three healthcare units. The questionnaire, completed by 638 service users, features three different sections: the socio-demographic characteristics of users, the healthcare visit context, and finally the level of user satisfaction with the services received. Six weak points are identified and improvement in these areas would drive innovation in healthcare provision and the development of the respective organisational units studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernanda Maria Duarte Nogueira & Maria José de Matos Rainho & Lucinda Fátima Costa Vaz Silva, 2013. "Knowledge and satisfaction - two premises for healthcare service innovation and development: the perspective of UCSPVR users," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3/4), pages 383-404.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:14:y:2013:i:3/4:p:383-404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56234
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:14:y:2013:i:3/4:p:383-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.