IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v6y2014i1p87-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontier analysis of the Philippine manufacturing efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo S. Gayosa
  • Emilyn Cabanda

Abstract

This research investigates the efficiency of 100 firms from ten selected manufacturing industries in the Philippines over the period 1995-2004, using the two frontier models. The aim of this research is to evaluate and measure the technical efficiency of selected firms by applying the data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) approaches. A total of 1,000 pooled data are analysed using both DEA and SFA methods. New findings reveal that the average technical efficiency scores of DEA and SFA are 57.4% and 82.63, respectively, but no statistically significant correlation found. New results also suggest that older firms tend to be more technically inefficient than younger firms while larger firms tend to be more technically efficient than smaller firms. Significantly, this research has also found that an imposition of higher tariff rates can make firms to be technically inefficient. Overall, this research provides significant evidences on the usefulness of two frontier methods for evaluating manufacturing efficiency as alternative tools of performance measurement for managerial decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo S. Gayosa & Emilyn Cabanda, 2014. "Frontier analysis of the Philippine manufacturing efficiency," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 87-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:87-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=59733
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:87-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.