IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v24y2025i1-2p72-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The future of recruitment: a mixed-methods scenario analysis in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Weinert
  • Elmar Günther
  • Silko Pfeil

Abstract

The shortage of skilled workers is becoming increasingly concerning for companies, as it poses a significant risk to their competitiveness. To counter this shortage, recruiting professionals need to be more effective than ever before. To obtain an evidence-based evaluation of the likely developments in recruiting in Germany, a scenario study was conducted. To comprehensively address our common research question, we employ a mixed-methods approach, integrating both qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey. This combination allows us to capture a broad range of data, providing a deeper understanding of the research problem. After an initial qualitative survey of experts from practice and academia, various scenarios for the future of recruiting were developed. These scenarios were then evaluated in a subsequent quantitative study by 208 practitioners in terms of their impact on the current and future situation as well as on the practical work of recruiters. Overall, the study reveals significant challenges that will be confronted in recruitment up to the year 2035. If these scenarios materialise, companies in general and recruiting departments in particular will encounter a substantial need for change in the forthcoming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Weinert & Elmar Günther & Silko Pfeil, 2025. "The future of recruitment: a mixed-methods scenario analysis in Germany," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(1/2), pages 72-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:24:y:2025:i:1/2:p:72-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=147077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:24:y:2025:i:1/2:p:72-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.