IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v1y2001i2-3-4p183-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The human side of continuous improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Clas Berling

Abstract

This study explores why employees should want to actively participate in an improvement process and to do so within groups. Small-group activities are often considered an integral part of Continuous Improvement (CI) and there are numerous methods and tools available as well as established procedures for using them. Why then are some companies more successful in establishing a CI process than others? One important element can be that the employees are motivated and see advantages in this way of working. Most definitions of CI include the use of specific methods/tools and the participation of all employees. One important element in establishing a lasting improvement process can be that the employees are motivated to participate. The aim of this work is to find motives for employees to participate in CI-activities. In 12 companies which were establishing improvement processes, 56 groups discussed motivation and presented motivating factors. These factors were used as the basis for a questionnaire, which has been answered by 130 respondents to date. It was found that the motives were very much seen from the individual's point of view. The most important were job security, rewards, participation and empowerment and facilitation of work. The experience of small-groups activities in achieving improvements was positive, but extended training in teamwork was requested.

Suggested Citation

  • Clas Berling, 2001. "The human side of continuous improvement," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2/3/4), pages 183-191.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:1:y:2001:i:2/3/4:p:183-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=1004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:1:y:2001:i:2/3/4:p:183-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.