IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v12y2012i1-2p92-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When workplace learning fails: individual and organisational limitations – exemplarily demonstrated by the issue of responsibility in work life

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Harteis

Abstract

There is a consensus in educational, managerial, and business debates that economic and societal changes in globalisation demand knowledge-based enterprises and employees who permanently develop and actualise their competences. Hence, workplace learning has become a crucial aspect of business organisation. However, the mainstream perspective in literature focuses on the individual's demand and responsibility for his or her own success in developing the necessary competences. This contribution focuses on observing the current debates on responsibility in work life and investigates individual and organisational limitations of workplace learning. Taking into consideration two studies on workplace learning, oppositional findings are to be discussed: on the basis of aggregated quantitative data favourable conditions for workplace learning appear. However, qualitative analyses on the level of individual respondents show a somewhat different picture. Employees experience limited participation in crucial aspects and experience limited rewards for individual competence development. This article concludes that successful workplace learning is not only an individual's responsibility but also a crucial task for the management of a business and its workplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Harteis, 2012. "When workplace learning fails: individual and organisational limitations – exemplarily demonstrated by the issue of responsibility in work life," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 92-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:12:y:2012:i:1/2:p:92-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:12:y:2012:i:1/2:p:92-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.