IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v12y2012i1-2p77-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

All by myself. Research into employees' informal learning experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Van Der Klink
  • Jo Boon
  • Kathleen Schlusmans

Abstract

Informal learning is seen as an important phenomenon in the contemporary era of lifelong learning. This study examined informal learning activities and its outcomes as well as the factors that influenced, either positively or negatively, informal learning. In total 24 employees of the Dutch Open University were interviewed about their main informal learning experiences over the last two years. Findings revealed that the majority of the informal learning outcomes are skill-based, generic and applicable in a larger cluster of jobs than participants' present jobs. Participants favoured learning activities that allow high levels of internal locus of control. The main stimulus for informal learning lies in the changing demands of their daily job. Other organisational, job and employee characteristics, such as age, job tenure, attitude of supervisor and colleagues, hardly influenced participants' informal learning. The article concludes with some critical remarks on the value of informal learning from the perspective of lifelong learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Van Der Klink & Jo Boon & Kathleen Schlusmans, 2012. "All by myself. Research into employees' informal learning experiences," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 77-91.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:12:y:2012:i:1/2:p:77-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44201
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:12:y:2012:i:1/2:p:77-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.