IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v11y2011i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informal learning in the workplace: a comparison of two models

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick R. Walden
  • Valerie C. Bryan
  • Sunil Ramlall

Abstract

This article introduced Walden's process model of informal workplace learning (Walden, 2008) and compared this model to that reported by Cseh et al. (1999). Secondarily, this article proposed suggestions for technology-enhanced effective informal workplace learning practices. Differences between the two models were described. It was found that Walden's model lent empirical support to Cseh, Watkins and Marsick's model. Walden's model lacked an examination of multiple alternative solutions to identified problems and a framing/re-framing of business contexts after learning, both of which were part of Cseh, Watkins and Marsick's model. Walden's model did, however, add a step for implementation of action based on learning in the workplace as well as a time frame with which learners engaged in informal learning strategy use. These two additions were not included in Cseh, Watkins and Marsick's model.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick R. Walden & Valerie C. Bryan & Sunil Ramlall, 2011. "Informal learning in the workplace: a comparison of two models," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41112
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.