IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v10y2010i2p117-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collectivism versus individualism in police cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Cathrine Filstad
  • Petter Gottschalk

Abstract

This article explores how organisational culture, as a complex ensemble of values, attitudes, symbols, rules, and practice, emerges as people react to situations and exigencies shaped by its members' interpretations, and how it develops as people respond in various meaningful ways. We study police cultures and their interpretation of values, more specifically among newcomers in law enforcement, counter terrorist officers and criminal investigators in the Norwegian police force. Cultural values are related to characteristics of policemen as more collectivistic than individualistic in their interpretation and awareness of their own organisational culture. We find that the police culture is characterised as more collectivistic than individualistic. However, there are significant variations related to the respondents' interpretation of values. Rather than being absolutely individualistic or collectivistic, police officers seem to be somewhere between the two on a scale ranging from extreme individualism to extreme collectivism, especially with regard to the complexity of attitudes, symbols and rules related to cultural values. Each officer's location on this scale seems influenced by experience and duties at hand. The officers also vary in their responses on the basis of demographic background, individual personalities and interpretations.

Suggested Citation

  • Cathrine Filstad & Petter Gottschalk, 2010. "Collectivism versus individualism in police cultures," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 117-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:117-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=31439
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:117-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.