IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgeni/v13y2000i1-2-3p159-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solar energy options for renewable energy economies

Author

Listed:
  • David R. Mills

Abstract

The author gives a personal view of how solar energy is developing and should develop, and what we should be looking for in global systems which can be compared against a fossil and nuclear future. The author believes that biomass generation, solar thermal electricity and wind energy have the largest renewable generation potential over the next 15 years. It is important to value the environmental and economic benefits of an interconnected system rather than model a single technology replacement. We need to: 1. include a lifetime pollution input/output analysis which fairly compares all options; 2. base system comparisons upon appropriate groups of technologies which provide a complete energy service; 3. account for synergies inherent in mixes of renewable energy technologies; 4. account for load following of the entire grid diurnal and annual load pattern instead of an ability to deliver baseload electricity supply. In the case of nuclear energy, solar technology is likely to exhibit similar pollution reduction advantages without a technical relationship to weapons production. On the basis of risk avoidance and cost, consideration should be given to reallocation of current nuclear development funding to solar technology.

Suggested Citation

  • David R. Mills, 2000. "Solar energy options for renewable energy economies," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1/2/3), pages 159-169.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:13:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:159-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=864
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schläpfer, August, 2009. "Hidden biases in Australian energy policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 456-460.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:13:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:159-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=13 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.