IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v13y2021i5p508-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential of crowdfunding for sustainable development: a comparison of sustainable and conventional crowdfunding projects

Author

Listed:
  • Isabell Tenner

Abstract

Crowdfunding bears great potential for sustainable entrepreneurs, who often face difficulties in receiving loans from traditional financing mechanisms. Because such ventures are able to tackle pressing environmental and social issues, they are of interest to researchers, and recent studies have already identified factors that increase their crowdfunding success. However, it remains unstudied as to what potential sustainable crowdfunding holds in contributing towards sustainable development and to what extent crowdfunding projects that are environmentally, socially, sustainability- and conventionally oriented actually differ. Based on a quantitative dataset, 282 investment-based crowdfunding projects were characterised along the entrepreneurship typology suggested by Thompson and colleagues. The results revealed that the marketing function of crowdfunding was prevalent for environmentally oriented crowdfunding projects. Socially oriented crowdfunding projects were identified as small scale compared to other project types, since they aimed for lower funding targets. Finally, conventionally oriented crowdfunding projects mainly used crowdfunding to finance service and organisational innovations. Based on these insights, implications for research and practice are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabell Tenner, 2021. "The potential of crowdfunding for sustainable development: a comparison of sustainable and conventional crowdfunding projects," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(5), pages 508-527.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:508-527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=119146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Abu Bashar & Iqbal Thonse Hawaldar & Muneer Shaik & Mohammed Selim, 2022. "What Do We Know about Crowdfunding and P2P Lending Research? A Bibliometric Review and Meta-Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:508-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.