IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v5y2005i1p14-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design for the environment: life cycle assessment and sustainable packaging issues

Author

Listed:
  • S.G. Lee
  • X. Xu

Abstract

As extended producer responsibility gains ascendancy in sustainable development, proper management of the life cycle of a product is becoming more and more important. This paper presents a general overview of product life cycle assessment (LCA) and sustainable product packaging over the last four to five years. The review of life cycle assessment includes on overview of LCAs conducted over the last six to seven years for a wide variety of products. The application of the LCA methodology to the formulation of regulatory and public policies, especially in the USA and the Netherlands, and the outcome of the five-year national Japanese LCA initiative, are presented. The key issues and limitations confronting LCA, notably the role of weighting factors, are summarised. Some of these include the unequal treatment of qualitative and quantitative measures and the absence of a semantic ontology to unify the practice. Finally, the merits and shortcomings of a streamlined (abridged) (SLCA) are briefly reviewed. The review of sustainable product packaging is confined to the LCA of packaging systems and new, innovative environmentally-benign packaging materials, for example, biodegradable agricultural (compostable) polymers. The outcome of any packaging LCA should always be interpreted in light of the prevailing technology and the function of the packaging. Also discussed are the life cycle assessment of some packaging systems, new active or intelligent packaging materials, and initiatives across the manufacturing and service industry at dematerialising packaging. The ramifications of the landmark EU Directive on Packaging Waste 94/62/EU and its corresponding regulations in EU member states and some reasons for the varying degrees of success are presented. A more wide-ranging integrated approach, encompassing economic, social and environmental considerations, in conjunction with more efficient packaging designs, which economise on material and are recyclable, is the key to sustainable packaging.

Suggested Citation

  • S.G. Lee & X. Xu, 2005. "Design for the environment: life cycle assessment and sustainable packaging issues," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 14-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:14-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6505
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhonghang Bai & Lei Mu & Hsiung-Cheng Lin, 2020. "Green Product Design Based on the BioTRIZ Multi-Contradiction Resolution Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Joana C. Prata & Ana L. Patrício Silva & João P. da Costa & Catherine Mouneyrac & Tony R. Walker & Armando C. Duarte & Teresa Rocha-Santos, 2019. "Solutions and Integrated Strategies for the Control and Mitigation of Plastic and Microplastic Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. & Davoudpour, Y. & Saurabh, Chaturbhuj K. & Hossain, Md. S. & Adnan, A. S & Dungani, R. & Paridah, M.T. & Islam Sarker, Md. Z. & Fazita, M.R Nurul & Syakir, M.I & Haafiz, M.K.M., 2016. "A review on nanocellulosic fibres as new material for sustainable packaging: Process and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 823-836.
    4. Ângela Maria Marx & Istefani Carísio De Paula & Fabiane Sum, 2010. "Sustainable consumption in Brazil: Identification of preliminary requirements to guide product development and the definition of public policies," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(1), pages 51-62, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:14-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.