IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v48y2023i3p273-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of strategic motivations and mutual dependence on partner selection in SME coopetition

Author

Listed:
  • Robert V. Randolph
  • Hanqing Fang
  • Esra Memili
  • Veland Ramadani
  • Dilek Zamantılı Nayır

Abstract

Considering the significant economic impact of SMEs and their proclivity towards collaborative strategies, SME coopetition remains under researched despite evidence of its distinctiveness. Drawing upon resource dependence theory, we develop and test a model that considers the role of strategic motivations, proactive or reactive, as determinants of the emphasis on mutual dependence in partner selection. We argue that coopetition is a unique avenue for constraint absorption that is particularly relevant in SMEs motivated by resource limitations and perceived market necessities. Further, we argue that SMEs with more traditional proactive strategic motivations are more likely to view coopetition as an avenue for market exploitation and thus less likely to select partners based on mutual dependence, particularly when engaging with less trusted partners. Our findings, based on the study of 104 firms in the automotive sector, generally support our arguments and suggest a number of implications for the continued study of SME coopetition.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert V. Randolph & Hanqing Fang & Esra Memili & Veland Ramadani & Dilek Zamantılı Nayır, 2023. "The role of strategic motivations and mutual dependence on partner selection in SME coopetition," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 48(3), pages 273-295.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:273-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=129292
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:273-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.