IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v32y2017i3p338-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SMEs' international markets entry: testing the theory with Portuguese evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Vitor Braga
  • Tânia Queirós

Abstract

This research aims to test a number of hypothesis related to the process of business international entry, based on empirical evidence collected from SMEs located in the Region of Vale do Tâmega e Sousa (VT%S). This Portuguese area lacks empirical studies, although the entrepreneurial activity of the region is very dynamic. The methodology adopted includes the administration of a survey to firms located in the region, where 184 valid observations were collected. This data allowed to test six hypothesis found in the literature, related to the process of international entry and motivations and barriers associated. Our results allowed confirming that the theoretical perspectives provided by the Uppsala model and the network theory could be confirmed and that they have a considerable application to the entrepreneurial reality of the region. It was also possible to observe that the selection of the entry modes was influenced by the motives or opportunities present in the foreign markets. Finally, there are statistically significant differences on the motivations for international entry and on the perceived barriers to enter the international markets when comparing the three groups of firms used in this work.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitor Braga & Tânia Queirós, 2017. "SMEs' international markets entry: testing the theory with Portuguese evidence," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(3), pages 338-363.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:32:y:2017:i:3:p:338-363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:32:y:2017:i:3:p:338-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.