IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijemre/v8y2017i4p283-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social tie strength and virtual goods purchase decisions of online game players

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Zhao
  • Chun Qiu

Abstract

This paper investigates how social ties among online game players can influence their in-game purchase of virtual goods that are representative of the personalities and status of the players. Using the data provided by the operator of an online game, this paper finds that a player is more likely to purchase such a product if more of her peers (with either a strong tie or a weak tie) possess that same or similar product, with the strong-tie peers having a bigger influence on the purchase than that of the weak-tie ones. This paper also finds that, due to the product-sharing activities among strong-tie friends, a player is less likely to purchase a more expensive virtual good if more of his strong-tie friends already own a similar one. In terms of methodology, this paper uses generalised linear mixed models to identify strong and weak ties, and models customer purchase behaviours. This paper contributes to the literature of social connections and purchase decisions, and offers managerial implications on how to utilise social media that builds on the different strengths of social ties to promote consumer purchase.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Zhao & Chun Qiu, 2017. "Social tie strength and virtual goods purchase decisions of online game players," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 283-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:8:y:2017:i:4:p:283-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87711
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:8:y:2017:i:4:p:283-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=43 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.