IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijemre/v6y2015i4p259-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is animation effective for advertising offensive products? Insights from an internet advertising experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Pakakorn Rakrachakarn
  • George P. Moschis

Abstract

Technology has been changing the landscape of options available to advertisers, making it easier and less expensive to create animated advertisements. Although animated ads have been increasingly used in recent decades, relatively little is known about their effectiveness or circumstances that might be most effective. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of animation in advertising offensive products. A laboratory 2 × 2 × 2 within-subject experiment was conducted to obtain young adults' responses toward animated and static banner ads of offensive and non-offensive products. The results revealed an interaction between banner ad design and offensive product. Specifically, when used in offensive product advertisements, animated banner ads were not effective in increasing consumer attention, but yielded a positive response in terms of attitude toward the product. The findings support the information-processing model in predicting consumer cognitive responses toward cartoon ads, whereas consumer affective responses are in line with the uses and gratifications perspective, as well arousal and distinctive theories. The study findings can be used to guide ad advertisers and marketers in determining the banner ad designs that are suitable for offensive products.

Suggested Citation

  • Pakakorn Rakrachakarn & George P. Moschis, 2015. "Is animation effective for advertising offensive products? Insights from an internet advertising experiment," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 259-276.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:6:y:2015:i:4:p:259-276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=73451
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:6:y:2015:i:4:p:259-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=43 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.