IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijemre/v6y2015i3p179-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

B2C social media value gap-model: a study of the Dutch online retailing

Author

Listed:
  • Efthymios Constantinides
  • Lonieke Schepers
  • Sjoerd De Vries

Abstract

Social media are extensively used by customers and businesses in the B2C domain but the objectives and the way the two parties use them are different. Based on the uses and gratifications theory, the article identifies similarities and differences in motives and use of social media in retailing. The study establishes that retailers attribute different values to social media tactics than the values experienced by customers and identifies differences in motives and usage of social media by the two parties. The findings underline the ambiguity as to the value and effectiveness of social media, underlying the need for better analysis and understanding of customer value drivers and expectations when business engage social media as marketing strategy. The findings form the basis of a social media B2C value gap model that identifies value gaps experienced by retailers and consumers using social media applications as part of their online and traditional interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Efthymios Constantinides & Lonieke Schepers & Sjoerd De Vries, 2015. "B2C social media value gap-model: a study of the Dutch online retailing," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 179-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:6:y:2015:i:3:p:179-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=70802
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:6:y:2015:i:3:p:179-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=43 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.