IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v11y2016i4p317-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (dis-)embedded firm. Complex structure and dynamics in inter-firm relations: adding institutionalisation as a Veblenian dimension to the Coase-Williamson approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram Elsner
  • Henning Schwardt

Abstract

The increasing complexity of the environment of firms seems to have outgrown the traditional Coase-Williamson transaction-cost framework with its market-hierarchy dichotomy. We propose to integrate an institutional dimension to enhance the theory of the firm and the analysis of real-world organisational forms. This institutional dimension is conceptualised as an original institutional (Veblenian) dichotomy that ranges between instrumental cooperative networking and ceremonial encapsulation (lock-in), as power- and status-seeking. Thus, a more comprehensive two-dimensional organisational space is drafted, which can better map the numerous and diverse forms of production and innovation systems, and serve to address questions of their emergence as spatial clusters and corporate networks. In addition to ideal market and hierarchy, it provides the ideal solution of institutionalised network cooperation as a third vanishing point and corner. The resulting organisational triangle is considered a heuristic for inter-firm organisational research. As a check of its usefulness, this device is applied to recent developments in the global corporate economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram Elsner & Henning Schwardt, 2016. "The (dis-)embedded firm. Complex structure and dynamics in inter-firm relations: adding institutionalisation as a Veblenian dimension to the Coase-Williamson approach," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 317-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:317-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=77021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:317-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.