IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v6y2015i1p81-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R%D expenditure, financing policy, and default risk

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Mien Lin
  • Shieh-Liang Chen
  • Chin-Fang Chao

Abstract

This paper finds that after controlling for board composition, firms with larger cash constraints tend to grant stock options to managers as performance rewards. The interaction item between cash constraint shortfall and past stock returns performance is positively related to stock option grant. The findings also show that firms tend to raise funds using long-term bank loans or bonds when the managers own higher holdings of stock options, but the financing policy of long-term debts is unrelated to the growth opportunity of a firm. By using initial default risk increase as a proxy for the wealth transfers from debt-holders to shareholders, we find that the long-term debts are negatively related to the change in initial default risk. For a firm with higher financial constraints, the current R%D expenditure is positively related to initial default risk increase. Moreover, the holdings of stock options of managers are negatively related to earnings management. The interaction term between the holding of stock options and R%D expenditures is positively related to earnings management. It means that for firms of high spending on R%D, managers with larger stock options holdings more concern about their investment's interests, and therefore managers have higher incentives to perform earnings management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Mien Lin & Shieh-Liang Chen & Chin-Fang Chao, 2015. "R%D expenditure, financing policy, and default risk," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 81-104.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:81-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68982
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:81-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.