IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v9y2018i4p401-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a more accurate audit assessment: can corporate social performance provide clues?

Author

Listed:
  • Angie M. Abdel Zaher
  • Dina M. Abdel Zaher

Abstract

Regulators have been particularly concerned with the increased frequency of auditor's deficiencies related to material misstatement as reported in the 2017 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection brief. This research examines the relationship between auditor's risk of failing to capture material misstatement and the clients' social responsibility concerns. The findings indicate that clients with social performance concerns (human rights, environment, and governance) were associated with higher auditor's risk assessment, as indicated by higher audit fees. The results are consistent after controlling for various auditor and client variables. Implications of this study support the importance of incorporating social performance of clients in the auditor's evaluation since it can provide key insights into the client's underlying risk of future litigations which can arise due to socially irresponsive behaviours. In doing so, we seek to come closer to an accurate client assessment as well as respond to the call of PCAOB for minimising the deficiencies of the auditing process particular in the area of material misstatement.

Suggested Citation

  • Angie M. Abdel Zaher & Dina M. Abdel Zaher, 2018. "Towards a more accurate audit assessment: can corporate social performance provide clues?," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 401-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:401-427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=96274
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:401-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.