IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v3y2012i2-3-4p210-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge transfer among experts: lessons from audit partner rotation

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Daugherty
  • Denise Dickins
  • Julia Higgs

Abstract

Given the complexity of the transfer of tacit knowledge, the presence of robust knowledge transfer practices are particularly critical when experts transfer knowledge to other experts (e.g., when companies newly-appoint members of the board of directors, or during the succession of key executives). Accounting firms are unique in that in many jurisdictions partners assigned to audit publicly-traded companies are mandated to periodically rotate their client engagement responsibilities, and these rotations in the US have become more frequent following passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The purpose of this study is to learn more about the knowledge transfer practices of partner-experts in public accounting firms to better understand this critical element of the audit process. As similar between-expert knowledge transfer techniques may be appropriate for use in other business contexts, lessons learned from audit partner rotation may help to mitigate knowledge transfer risks in other organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Daugherty & Denise Dickins & Julia Higgs, 2012. "Knowledge transfer among experts: lessons from audit partner rotation," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2/3/4), pages 210-224.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:3:y:2012:i:2/3/4:p:210-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51877
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:3:y:2012:i:2/3/4:p:210-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.