IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v8y2006i2-3p246-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing business performance: two models for environmental information

Author

Listed:
  • Cecily Raiborn
  • Brenda Joyner

Abstract

External stakeholders must consider four public responsibility areas of organisational behaviour that contribute to long-run financial viability: 1. environmental responsibility; 2. social responsibility; 3. employee health and safety; 4. ethics. Failure in any one of these areas could be the downfall of an organisation. This paper develops the Performance Scorecard Model to address reporting relative to performance on these nonmonetary issues of concern to organisational stakeholders. Another model, the Stakeholder Model of Public Responsibility Assessment, is also developed for all types of nonfinancial reporting. However, this paper focuses solely on the use of this model for environmental and sustainable development activities assessment. The models provide a basis from which companies can: articulate policies; report on and assess activities; tie policies to organisational strategy. These models should assist stakeholders in assessing whether particular firms are going beyond minimal expectations and pursuing substantive public responsibility policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecily Raiborn & Brenda Joyner, 2006. "Assessing business performance: two models for environmental information," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2/3), pages 246-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:8:y:2006:i:2/3:p:246-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:8:y:2006:i:2/3:p:246-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.