IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v5y2003i2-3p166-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Total productivity: a stakeholder perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Stainer, Lorice Stainer

Abstract

Every business interacts with its environment in its activity to provide goods and services that satisfy its customers. Ideally, something beneficial for society should also be created by that business to justify its own existence. The underlying theme of the stakeholder concept is corporate social responsibility, which relates to the obligations that an organisation has towards other parties. Major stakeholders include employees, shareholders, customers and society with the latter depending on and expecting much from business. Their influence on corporate values ought to be recognised and assessed. The integration of stakeholder value with business performance measurement and management is explored and related to the concept of total productivity. Thus, total productivity is featured as being an important generator of such a value through the development of the index of Super Total Productivity (STP). It is based on the total productivity paradigm as well as on an organisation's major stakeholder satisfaction metrics, these being customer, employee and societal dimensions; examples are given. The ingredients of good business performance are accentuated in the light of this all-embracing STP by taking into account an inclusive approach. In the quest for operations excellence, it prevails as a most meaningful yardstick to achieve a synergetic bottom line which adds both economic and social values.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Stainer, Lorice Stainer, 2003. "Total productivity: a stakeholder perspective," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2/3), pages 166-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:5:y:2003:i:2/3:p:166-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=3257
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:5:y:2003:i:2/3:p:166-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.