IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v2y2000i1-2-3p72-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marketing performance measurement: which way is up?

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Ambler, Flora Kokkinaki

Abstract

The study reported in this paper explores the measurement of marketing performance across different business sectors. It concerns the measures collected, their relative importance and whether business characteristics (e.g. firm size, sector) differentiate such practices. The extent to which firms are satisfied with their current marketing measurement systems and the improvements sought also provide insights into how measurement is being used to enhance performance. Secondary data were collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 44) and a questionnaire-based survey (n = 531). Internal financial measures are, overall, regarded as more important measures of marketing performance than those from the market. Consistent with previous findings, customer and competitor orientation are positively associated with business performance, with customer orientation being the more important. Further, firm orientation influences how marketing is assessed in practice, e.g. customer-oriented firms tend to utilize customer based information more than firms less so oriented. Although the assessment of marketing performance requires consideration of the change of the main marketing asset, few firms formally assess brand equity for this purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Ambler, Flora Kokkinaki, 2000. "Marketing performance measurement: which way is up?," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2/3), pages 72-85.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:2:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:72-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:2:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:72-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.