IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v27y2026i4p498-530.html

A comparative study between traditional and modern asset management systems for livelihood sustainability in the Guji community of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Dawit Udessa Gede

Abstract

This research aimed to comprehensively examine asset management practices within the Guji community of Ethiopia. It explored the characteristics and components of traditional asset management systems and their contribution to livelihood sustainability. A mixed-methods approach was employed, utilising qualitative data from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, alongside quantitative data from surveys with 384 participants. Data analysis included thematic analysis of qualitative findings and statistical analysis of quantitative data. Results indicated that the Guji community's traditional asset management practices significantly promote livelihood sustainability by maintaining economic stability, fostering social cohesion, promoting environmental stewardship, and preserving cultural traditions. The originality of this study lies in its multi-dimensional approach, integrating qualitative and quantitative methodologies to provide a nuanced perspective on the impacts of traditional asset management. This research highlights the complex interconnections between asset management and community well-being, extending beyond mere economic factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawit Udessa Gede, 2026. "A comparative study between traditional and modern asset management systems for livelihood sustainability in the Guji community of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(4), pages 498-530.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:27:y:2026:i:4:p:498-530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=154890
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:27:y:2026:i:4:p:498-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.