IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v26y2025i3p389-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A realist evaluation of the performance implications of flying faculty model from the perspectives of local faculty: evidence from British TNE programs in Qatar

Author

Listed:
  • Khalifa Alsalahi Alyafei

Abstract

This research uses the realist evaluation framework to analyse the flying faculty model (FFM) within a British transnational higher education program in Qatar. This work aims to understand the facilitators and barriers of the FFM on local faculty and how it either contributes to or interrupts their work. Following the realist evaluation approach, a total of eight semi-structured interviews were conducted on two groups of local faculty, full-time and part-time local faculty (n = 8) who had taught on the program for at least one semester. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify the key contexts and program mechanisms that led to meaningful outcomes for local faculty. Results show that the FFM provides opportunities for local faculty, including faculty-to-faculty support, knowledge sharing and policy implementation, which may help enhance their confidence in teaching and ensure their career progression as well as promote the successful enactment of partnership agreements. It also highlights certain obstacles, such as lack of engagement among some fly in faculty members and inflexibility in designing a more contextualise curriculum.

Suggested Citation

  • Khalifa Alsalahi Alyafei, 2025. "A realist evaluation of the performance implications of flying faculty model from the perspectives of local faculty: evidence from British TNE programs in Qatar," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(3), pages 389-404.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:389-404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145877
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:389-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.