IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v26y2025i3p362-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Higher education students' views of conducting traditional research projects under supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Ramesh Gupta
  • Pravin Balaraman
  • Tom Keegan

Abstract

Universities compete for an increasingly diverse student population by utilising digital technology to meet educational requirements. The literature currently lacks an empirical assessment of undergraduate and masters students' views of research and academic writing skills teaching. We sought the views of business students in a mixed methods study utilising survey and focus group data underpinned by an interpretivist methodology. Our qualitative and quantitative findings and results demonstrate students' enthusiasm for our traditional approach to teaching research and academic writing skills. Students particularly benefit from supervisors' guidance in this endeavour. We therefore advocate retention of traditional approaches to teaching research and academic writing skills to meet students' needs to make universities competitive in an international market. Further research is now required to determine the views of university undergraduate and masters students in all disciplines. Supervisors, whose contributions are valued by students, need now to be equally recognised by their universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramesh Gupta & Pravin Balaraman & Tom Keegan, 2025. "Higher education students' views of conducting traditional research projects under supervision," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(3), pages 362-388.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:362-388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:362-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.