IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v25y2024i4p492-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of organisational entrenchment on unethical behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanine Ângela Vieira Zagheto
  • Samara Monteiro Pereira do Nascimento
  • Juliana Barreiros Porto

Abstract

According to the social exchange theory, individuals establish exchange relationships within organisations that should be rewarding for both parties. An imbalanced relationship leads to negative reactions from individuals. If employees find themselves without alternatives, they can entrench themselves within an organisation. The entrenchment concept is linked to a protective environment. However, the idea of leaving this comfort zone generates the perception of loss of accumulated investments and we inquire if it could also promote unethical behaviours. A sample of 352 employees (mean age 37.9 years old, SD = 10.7 years), answered the observed unethical behaviour, organisational entrenchment, and social desirability scales, which were applied at two-wave. Multiple regression results indicate that entrenchment exhibits a positive relationship with unethical behaviour. Social desirability moderates the relationship, highlighting the importance of controlling this variable. These results suggest that employee perceptions of entrenchment are an important predictor of unethical work behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanine Ângela Vieira Zagheto & Samara Monteiro Pereira do Nascimento & Juliana Barreiros Porto, 2024. "The effects of organisational entrenchment on unethical behaviour," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(4), pages 492-507.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:25:y:2024:i:4:p:492-507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139401
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:25:y:2024:i:4:p:492-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.