IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v23y2022i1-2p76-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural distance or cultural similarity? A study of academic expatriates in the UAE

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Fenech
  • Priya Baguant
  • Ihab Abdelwahed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between cultural distance and, the cultural competence and adjustment of academic expatriates in the UAE. The cultural distance paradox has been investigated amongst the general population of expatriates but not amongst academic expatriates. The two hypotheses under study are: H1: There is a positive relationship between cultural distance and expatriate social adjustment; H2: There is a positive relationship between cultural distance and expatriate cultural competence. The theoretical framework of this study is the theory of selective perception and dissonance and the theory of change. Qualitative data was collected from 103 academic expatriates. The main findings in this study are in support of the cultural distance paradox. Additionally, expatriates from different cultures to that of the host country culture do better in cultural competence and adjustment than expatriates from cultures that are similar to the host country culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Fenech & Priya Baguant & Ihab Abdelwahed, 2022. "Cultural distance or cultural similarity? A study of academic expatriates in the UAE," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1/2), pages 76-89.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:23:y:2022:i:1/2:p:76-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=119563
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:23:y:2022:i:1/2:p:76-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.