IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v22y2021i2-3p291-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do single takeovers outperform corporate acquisition programs? Evidence from the French stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Boufama
  • Elena Rogova

Abstract

This paper compares the profitability of French acquiring firms following the launch of corporate acquisition programs with that of single takeovers, by examining wealth of acquirers in both cases. While using the event study methodology for the calculation of abnormal returns for single takeovers, this study also considers the model of partially anticipated events for the assessment of the economic impact and the announcement effect of acquisition attempts. For the acquisition programs, we used a sample containing 46 French active acquirers, which launched 97 acquisition attempts between 1997 and 2007. For single takeovers, we examined 23 acquisitions by the same acquirers. The results of this study show that French investors obtain positive returns during and around the month of takeover announcement. French acquirers earn an average of 3.75% in two months, the month of announcement and the following month, and 4.02% in the month of announcement and the month preceding the announcement. These results show that single takeovers outperform corporate acquisition programs, since these same French acquiring firms do not generate any profitability following the launch of these investment programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Boufama & Elena Rogova, 2021. "Do single takeovers outperform corporate acquisition programs? Evidence from the French stock market," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2/3), pages 291-308.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:22:y:2021:i:2/3:p:291-308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=116411
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:22:y:2021:i:2/3:p:291-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.