IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v19y2018i3p253-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of sales employees: a comparative investigation in the pharmaceutical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ehtasham Ghauri

Abstract

Performance evaluation (PE) of employees is perceived as one of the most practical organisational challenges because of its influence on employees' retention, satisfaction and their future performance. Since PE is influenced by contextual elements, understanding of these specific factors is of critical importance for the development and improvement of PE practices particularly when organisations are borrowing such practices from other contexts. Employing a comparative multiple case study approach among the multinational and national pharmaceutical organisations, this study conducted in-depth interviews with sales representatives, supervisors and human resource managers to capture PE objectives and employees' expectations from the process. The results found that PE practices closely related to the management style in the company rather than the PE objectives. The industry specific empirical evidence highlighted multiple factors including informality in PE to be contributing to dissonance among the sales employees. Support for conducting field research in Pakistan is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehtasham Ghauri, 2018. "Performance evaluation of sales employees: a comparative investigation in the pharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 253-279.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:253-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92756
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:253-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.