IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v19y2018i1p105-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A data-driven analysis of the current debate on the linkages between performance and strategy studies

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola G. Castellano
  • Katia Corsi
  • Monica Bartolini
  • Francesca Bernini
  • Andrea Cardoni
  • Graziano Coller
  • Vincenzo Fasone
  • Luca Fornaciari

Abstract

This paper focuses on how the relations between performance management and measurement (PMM) and strategy are considered by scholars. These relations are crucial in building a comprehensive body of knowledge of a complex and multifaceted phenomenon which attracts scholars pertaining to different management disciplines. The results obtained by adopting quantitative methodologies (descriptive statistics and text-mining analysis) on a sample of articles recently published in the most influential international 'business, and management accounting' journals, contribute to extant literature by providing evidence that several connections exist between key-concepts which are usually considered an exclusive heritage of single management disciplines, such as strategy, organisation, management control, and so forth. For that reason, an integration of competences and methodologies is needed to support further research in the field. We also find evidence suggesting that the organisational perspective should be particularly considered when investigating the relations between strategy, management control systems and PMM.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola G. Castellano & Katia Corsi & Monica Bartolini & Francesca Bernini & Andrea Cardoni & Graziano Coller & Vincenzo Fasone & Luca Fornaciari, 2018. "A data-driven analysis of the current debate on the linkages between performance and strategy studies," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 105-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:105-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88491
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:105-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.