IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v18y2017i1p25-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balanced scorecard edge over memorandum of understanding for public enterprises in India

Author

Listed:
  • Seema Gupta
  • Vijay Kumar Gupta

Abstract

This paper unfolds two objectives; first, assesses the impact of memorandum of understanding (MoU, a socio-economic performance measurement technique) on the performance of public sector enterprises (PSEs) in India and identifies the gaps under MoU system. Second, enumerates how balanced scorecard (BSC) bridged these gaps and proposes broadly a generic model of BSC (for performance evaluation and assessment) for PSEs in India. BSC is an instrument, takes into consideration multiple indicators and includes financial and non-financial parameters. The study has used ratios to examine the performance of MoU opted PSEs over a period of more than one and half decade. The paper further explains the perspectives and importance of BSC. How BSC has an edge over MoU? The findings reveal that the extent of MoU is limited to the pre-specified objectives determined by the top management of a PSE and government, non-allocation of task linked incentives and limited involvement of all the stakeholders. Whereas, the BSC comprehensively covers all the gaps identified under MoU to meet the organisational vision strategically through set of objectives; it allows the participation of all the stakeholders, global practices to accomplish corporate objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Seema Gupta & Vijay Kumar Gupta, 2017. "Balanced scorecard edge over memorandum of understanding for public enterprises in India," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 25-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:18:y:2017:i:1:p:25-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=80840
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:18:y:2017:i:1:p:25-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.