IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v15y2014i2p127-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TQM in the British National Health Service: nine reasons for failure

Author

Listed:
  • Uche Nwabueze

Abstract

Total quality management (TQM) is dead in the NHS. That is what many academics and arm chair pundits suggest, and there is much evidence to support their claims. Many writers say that TQM is time consuming, and NHS managers found that applying TQM too complex and pushing professional quality rather than systemic quality was difficult, thus creating cultural confusion and organisational chaos. There might be some validity to these findings and while many organisations in the manufacturing industry have embraced TQM, fewer particularly in healthcare, have been able to make it really succeed. This is because TQM is largely abandoned, or ignored to a death befitting another 'flavour of the month'. In light of this background, the paper identified nine factors responsible for the failure of TQM in the NHS. The paper would suggest that if these factors were initially identified and eliminated prior to adoption and implementation, the failure of TQM as the remedy for all ills associated with the poor provision and delivery of quality patient care and caring would have been prevented.

Suggested Citation

  • Uche Nwabueze, 2014. "TQM in the British National Health Service: nine reasons for failure," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 127-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:127-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:127-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.