IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v10y2008i4p412-433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perceived fairness and efficiency of used car markets

Author

Listed:
  • Pingjun Jiang

Abstract

Two totally different sets of efficiency scores are obtained under two different consumer decision-making processes. It is found that distortions in the used car market are lower than previously thought. Cars with higher prices are perceived efficient when consumers set 'price range' as the first criterion in their purchase decision process. Lower priced cars are considered efficient if 'model year' is the first factor entering into purchase decision process. It is also found that the 'price range' decision-makers perceive a much more efficient used car market than 'model year' decision-makers. If a decision has to be made among car models within a certain price range, European and Korean car models are better choices compared to US ones. However, when making choices among cars of the same model year, US car models are better choices than European and Japanese car models. The segment of the secondary market with the older version car models tends to have a higher average efficiency, compared to the segments with newer versions. Furthermore, the high-efficiency car models are not getting the high overall ratings from customers. However, car models that are better rated by consumers are indeed charged with a higher price.

Suggested Citation

  • Pingjun Jiang, 2008. "The perceived fairness and efficiency of used car markets," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 412-433.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:10:y:2008:i:4:p:412-433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=19995
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:10:y:2008:i:4:p:412-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.