IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v40y2022i2p259-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can topic-modelling of user-reviews reshape market surveys? Exploring factors influencing usage intention of e-learning services through a novel multi-method approach

Author

Listed:
  • Arghya Ray
  • Pradip Kumar Bala
  • Rashmi Jain

Abstract

Online user-generated-content is not only a critical performance parameter for service-providers but also serve as a vital information source for prospective customers. For understanding the factors influencing the adoption or continuance of an e-service, traditional approaches required a qualitative or quantitative-based analysis. In this study, we propose a novel approach to generate and analyse path model in real-time by combining the qualitative, quantitative and natural language processing (NLP)-based approaches. We undertook an emic approach using semi-structured interview schedule (ten participants) and an etic approach using topic modelling on extant literature (3,570 articles) for exploring factors influencing motives behind use of e-learning services. We tested the path-model using traditional quantitative-based (542 respondents) and the proposed NLP-based approaches (3,227 online reviews) through structural equation modelling (SEM). Results of this study revealed content gratification as the most important predictor of usage intention. This study concludes with the implications, limitations and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Arghya Ray & Pradip Kumar Bala & Rashmi Jain, 2022. "How can topic-modelling of user-reviews reshape market surveys? Exploring factors influencing usage intention of e-learning services through a novel multi-method approach," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(2), pages 259-284.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:259-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=123646
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:259-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.