IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v32y2022i1p64-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalisation and HR practices in Africa: when culture refuses to make way for so-called universalistic perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Dieu Hack-Polay
  • John Opute
  • Mahfuzur Rahman

Abstract

The paper examines how factors embedded in the cultural and institutional framework in Sub-Saharan African organisations interact with global perspectives and resist changes in human resource management (HRM) processes. It examines the tensions between indigenous and historical factors, and external sources, in African HRM. The research surveyed 100 African HRM professionals from major institutional actors in Nigeria. The research found that, despite globalisation, African HRM practices remain largely culture-bound. Many aspects of Sub-Saharan African cultures pervade organisational processes, e.g., collectivism and paternalism, and 'refuse' to make way for change. However, some temerarious cultural aspects - often described as counter-productive - could be utilised for community and employee engagement. The paper makes a significant contribution to the scarce African HRM literature. It demonstrates that HRM policies have specific cultural orientations and reflect the societal predispositions of the region; this exemplifies how cultural paradigms, political spheres and organisational life are intertwined in African.

Suggested Citation

  • Dieu Hack-Polay & John Opute & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2022. "Globalisation and HR practices in Africa: when culture refuses to make way for so-called universalistic perspectives," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(1), pages 64-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:32:y:2022:i:1:p:64-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127366
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:32:y:2022:i:1:p:64-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.