IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbeaf/v6y2016i1p70-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loss aversion and decision fatigue at the Wimbledon tennis championship

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Mallard

Abstract

The multinomial logit analysis in this paper, which contributes to the literature that studies economic psychology in the sporting arena, tests for the effects of loss aversion and decision fatigue in the behaviour of professional tennis players as they deliver their first serves in one of the most competitive and lucrative annual tournaments in the world: the Wimbledon championships. It is proposed that the results demonstrate that the behaviour of professional tennis players exhibits loss aversion as they deal with the effects of decision fatigue. The findings have significant implications for the debate about whether experience, competition and high stakes ameliorate the effects of behavioural biases, for the design of behavioural experiments and for the construction of theoretical models of decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Mallard, 2016. "Loss aversion and decision fatigue at the Wimbledon tennis championship," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 70-91.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:70-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79880
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nejat Anbarci & K. Peren Arin & Christina Zenker, 2019. "Tennis Serve Data May Elude Some as Serves Get Too Fast," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 16(1), pages 124–129-1, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:70-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=237 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.