IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijarge/v8y2009i5-6p371-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moving on – European organic farming movements between political action and self-reflection

Author

Listed:
  • Heidrun Moschitz

Abstract

Organic farming movements in Europe are widely recognised as a positive force by market actors and civil society, as well as relevant actors in policy networks. At the same time, the organic movement is in a process of self-reflection, reconsidering its value basis. Taking account of both a policy network and a social movement perspective, this article seeks to understand political action of the organic sector. Making use of a cross-country comparison of European organic farming policy networks, it conceptualises the consequences of such action with regard to political influence and the identity of the organic farming movement. While different strategies are employed to influence politics, a space needs to be opened up within the movements for continuous innovation and the re-construction of a collective identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidrun Moschitz, 2009. "Moving on – European organic farming movements between political action and self-reflection," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5/6), pages 371-387.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:8:y:2009:i:5/6:p:371-387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=32641
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heidrun Moschitz & Svetla Stoeva & Petya Slavova & Dona Pickard & Zdravka Georgieva & Matthias Stolze, 2018. "Rethinking Organic Farming in the Post†Socialist Context: Lessons from Bulgaria," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 40-45, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:8:y:2009:i:5/6:p:371-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.