IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Motivating factors and barriers to sustainable consumer behaviour [1]

Listed author(s):
  • Sigrid Stagl, Sabine U. O'Hara
Registered author(s):

    While large scale, regionally concentrated food producers, processors and distributors are becoming more and more important, a number of consumers have become dissatisfied with this food system for various reasons. Some consumers search actively for alternatives. One of the more recent social innovations in the food sector are "Community Supported Agriculture" groups (CSAs). The aim of these groups is to provide consumers with healthy, locally grown food while at the same time revitalise local food economies. This paper addresses the question whether CSAs are likely to provide a broadly accepted alternative or only a limited one. With reference to a household survey in two distinct socio-economic neighbourhoods in upstate New York, the analysis examines the motivating factors for and the demand barriers of these alternative food production systems. The survey shows that there is a potential for expanding the alternative food markets that CSAs represent. This claim is based on two findings. Firstly, about 25% of the people interviewed indicated an interest in becoming members; general interest in CSAs being similar in the wealthier as well as the low-income neighbourhood. Secondly, a few factors preventing food demand through CSAs can be identified. These are the factors which CSA groups would have to address in one way or another, if they wanted to expand.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 75-88

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:75-88
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:75-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.